Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks? Essay - 1110 Words.
Nonetheless, leading public health institutions in Portugal helped drive taxes on sweet beverages up the agenda and in January 2017, Portugal brought into force a sugary drinks tax. Big steps forward. The results are impressive. Many companies have radically reduced the amount of sugar in their products and sales of sugary drinks have fallen.
Imposing tax can prevent obesity and reduce the expenses on obesity meanwhile it will generate more money for obesity treatment and prevention. The tax can also encourage the soft drink company to develop healthier drink. For example the company can use xylitol which is sugarless to replace sugar. Imposing tax on carbonated soft drinks is.
The first sugar tax on soft drinks was implemented in Hungary in 2011, part of a wider tax on pre-packed sweetened products, salty snacks and condiments, followed by France in 2012, charging manufacturers the equivalent of an extra 6p per litre for any beverage containing added sugar or artificial sweeteners.
Taxes on sugary drinks should not exist because in a free market economy the consumer decides what should be produced, the tax on sugary drinks will fail based on current taxes on sugary drinks and jobs will be lost due to poor sales in the beverage industry. Arkansas and West Virginia tax soda and are among the top 10 states for obesity.
Double the risk of diabetes in heavier women because of one or more servings of sugar-sweetened beverages. If there were a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, it may have given those women the extra incentive to drink water in place of the sugar-sweetened beverage. She also states that.
Taxing sugary drinks There is no direct correlation between the sale of sugary drinks and obesity. The fact too much sugar is bad for our health is pretty obvious, but taxing a single product is too narrow in focus to have a meaningful impact.
Taxing sugary drinks, however, was only acceptable to a minority. But for both nudging and taxing, the acceptability of the intervention increased the more effective participants judged them to be. This suggests that people are prepared to trade off their dislike of an intervention for achieving a goal they value, such as tackling obesity.